The battle of the unity of arenas How did the bombing of the Southern Suburb turn into a regional explosion

If the Israeli assault on the southern suburb on Sunday evening, which resulted in civilian casualties, was a test of the seriousness of Iran’s commitment to the equation of the unity of arenas and establishing the cessation of aggression on Lebanon as a main condition for de-escalation and ending the war, then the Iranian strikes that targeted the north of the occupied Palestinian territories only about 7 hours later, for the first time since the ceasefire, provided a decisive result for this test. Iran—and the Axis of Resistance—is prepared to return to large-scale fighting if the Israeli enemy doesn’t commit to stopping its operations against Lebanon, even if there are positive negotiating indicators on other files.
Dherar Al-Tayyeb – Al-Khabar Al-Yemeni:
Iran had clearly stated that it would bomb Israel in response to any assault on Beirut or its southern suburb, and then it demonstrated that practically and without any hesitation.
For Israel, this is an unambiguous major blow. Although Iran had already proven during the past period its success in imposing the reality of the unity of arenas by forcing the enemy to reduce the scope of its operations against Lebanon, using the Strait of Hormuz card, and the negotiating firmness that Trump encountered, Israel remained insistent on creating a maneuver space aimed at separating Lebanon from any American agreement with Iran. It tried to portray its ongoing operations in southern Lebanon and the direct negotiations with the Lebanese authority as a success in separating the arenas and establishing the principle of “freedom of action.” However, the heavy losses incurred by the Israeli army due to the resistance’s operations, given Hezbollah’s steadfastness in its position, made it difficult to market this image. Because the bombing of the southern suburb was certainly linked to the enemy’s need to deal with